Stop waiting for better cards

Play the hand you have, not the one you wish you had

In partnership with

Playing a Bad Hand Well

Always play the hand you have, not the one you wish you had.

Garry Tan

I think this might be one of the most useful pieces of advice I've come across for anyone trying to build something.

Most strategy advice assumes you're working with resources you don't have.

More capital. Better connections. More time. A team. The right skills.

The advice is always the same: build the perfect foundation first, then execute.

But that's not your hand.

Your hand right now probably looks like this:

Limited focused hours each week. Skills that are good enough but not world-class. A few warm connections but no real network. Maybe some client work but nothing consistent. An environment that's far from ideal for deep work.

That's not a criticism. That's just what's true for most people building something remotely.

The mistake is treating those constraints as temporary obstacles you need to eliminate before you can start playing seriously.

Waiting until you have the right setup. The right positioning. The right circumstances.

That's playing the hand you wish you had.

Here's the thing though.

You don't get better cards by waiting for them.

Playing the hand you actually have means building your entire approach around your real constraints right now. Not someday. Today.

If you only have ten focused hours a week, your strategy can't look like someone working forty.

If your network is small, you can't run a referral-based business model yet.

If you're working from cafes and shared spaces, you can't design workflows that require perfect silence.

This sounds obvious when I say it like that.

But most people don't actually do it.

They copy strategies built for completely different hands and then wonder why nothing works.

Constraint-based strategy looks different.

You start by naming your actual constraints. Not the ones you think you should have overcome by now. The real ones.

Time. Energy. Skills. Market access. Environment. Whatever is genuinely limiting you right now.

Then you ask: given this exact hand, what's the smallest, fastest path to my next goal?

Not the ideal path. The path that actually works with what you have today.

Most freelancers are constrained by one big bottleneck. Either lead flow or delivery capacity.

Not enough good opportunities coming in. Or too much work and not enough time to handle it well.

If your constraint is lead flow, spending energy on ten different marketing channels makes no sense. You don't have the hand for that.

Better to go deep on one or two things already kind of working. Warm outreach. One content platform. Referrals from your existing three clients.

If your constraint is delivery capacity, the answer isn't working harder or getting better at time management.

It's simplifying your offers. Raising prices. Stripping out everything non-essential so your system can flow at the speed of your available hours.

Corporate strategy assumes stability and resources.

That doesn't work when your reality is variable pipeline, limited hours, and one brain doing everything.

You need emergent strategy instead.

Pick one clear goal for the next few months. Figure out the smallest version you can test quickly. Act. See what happens. Adjust.

Be fast first. Be right later.

Ship something imperfect with what you have now. Refine once you have feedback.

This applies to remote work too.

Flexible hours and no commute are great. But they come with isolation, blurry boundaries, and workspaces that aren't built for focus.

Playing that hand well might mean doing your best client work during your natural peak focus window and pushing admin to off-peak.

It might mean locking in a good enough workspace instead of waiting for the perfect home office.

It might mean using time zone differences as a feature rather than treating them like a problem.

The pattern is the same: treat your constraints as inputs to your strategy, not obstacles you pretend don't exist.

There's a specific kind of pride that comes from playing a poor hand well.

Not the fake hustle version where you brag about twenty-hour days.

The real version where you look at limited resources and figure out how to make them work anyway.

A lot of skill shows up in that gap between what you have and what you make happen with it.

If you wanted to operationalize this, it's simple.

Every week, write down your actual hand. Hours available. Energy reality. Current pipeline. Any environmental constraints.

Name your single biggest constraint for the week.

Then ask: given this hand, what are the three highest-leverage actions I can definitely execute?

Commit to those first.

Only after those are done do you add any ideal-world work into whatever time remains.

That's it.

Most people spend years waiting for better cards.

The ones who actually build something are usually just the ones who stopped waiting and started playing.

Takeaway: Write down your biggest constraint right now. Then ask yourself what the best possible move is given that constraint, not given some imaginary future version of your circumstances.